Recently, at the Audio Mostly 2017 conference, my work with Rod Selfridge and Josh Reiss was published on Propellor Sound Synthesis. I was both published at the conference, on the conference organising committee, as a the webmaster and a member of the music team.More information is available here on the Intelligent Sound Engineering Blog, and an example of the propellor synthesis is available on youtube.
At the upcoming International Conference on Digital Audio Effects, I will be presenting my recent work on creating a sound effects taxonomy using unsupervised learning. A link to the paper can be found here.
A taxonomy of sound effects is useful for a range of reasons. Sound designers often spend considerable time searching for sound effects. Classically, sound effects are arranged based on some key word tagging, and based on what caused the sound to be created – such as bacon cooking would have the name “BaconCook”, the tags “Bacon Cook, Sizzle, Open Pan, Food” and be placed in the category “cooking”. However, most sound designers know that the sound of frying bacon can sound very similar to the sound of rain (See this TED talk for more info), but rain is in an entirely different folder, in a different section of the SFx Library.
Our approach, is to analyse the raw content of the audio files in the sound effects library, and allow a computer to determine which sounds are similar, based on the actual sonic content of the sound sample. As such, the sounds of rain and frying bacon will be placed much closer together, allowing a sound designer to quickly and easily find related sounds that relate to each other.
A full run down of the work is present on the Intelligent Audio Engineering Blog
It has been quite a while since I have posted, but I hope to resolve that shortly with a number of academic papers being published this summer,
In the meantime, there is some discussion over the use of sound effects in port production, and the fundamental fact that many things you hear as part of a soundscape are not the original recorded sound – this is the one of the fundamental justifications for my PhD and this is very well explained in this TED Talk:
For as long as digital audio has existed, there have been discussions as to sampling rate and bit depth. I have heard countless arguments between people of Analogue vs. Digital, 96kHz vs. 44.1kHz, 24 bit vs 16bit.
After numerous experiments and publications, discussions and tests on the subject, we seem to be getting towards the truth. In the June AES Journal, a new meta study on high resolution audio promises to identify what the biggest failing are in our experimental methods, how we can progress with research in this field and finally, what are the results of years of research in the field.
Last weekend saw the 140th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society — Europe’s largest gathering of audio professionals from around the globe, take place at Paris’ Palais des Congrès. From cutting edge research to fundamentals to practical application, the four-day technical program brings the opportunity to network with and learn from leading audio industry luminaries. Special events — including technical tours of premier production facilities and installs, student focused sessions and a 3 day manufacturer exposition round out the Convention. There was a particular focus on 3D and immersive audio at this Convention.
I was responsible for running all aspects of the student track of the convention, including Education and Career Fair, Student Design Competition, Recording Competitions and the Education Committee Meetings. At the end of the Convention I was promoted to Chair of the Student Delegate Assembly for Europe and International Regions.
The 61th International Conference of the Audio Engineering Society on Audio for Games took place in London from 10 to 12 February. This is the fifth edition of the Audio for Games conference which features a mixture of invited talks and academic paper sessions. Traditionally a biennial event, by popular demand the conference was organised in 2016 again following a very successful 4th edition in 2015.
Christian Heinrichs presented work from his doctoral research with Andrew McPherson, discussing Digital Foley and introducing FoleyDesigner, which allows for effectively using human gestures to control sound effects models.
I presented a paper in the Synthesis and Sound Design paper session, on weapon sound synthesis and my colleague William Wilkinson presented work on mammalian growls, both of which can be found in the conference proceedings.
Furthermore, Xavier Serra and Frederic Font presented the Audio Commons project and how the creative industries could benefit from and get access to content with liberal licenses.
Along with presenting work at this conference, I was also involved as the technical coordinator and webmaster for the Audio for Games community.
More information about the conference can be found on the conference website.
During the DAFx conference dinner, awards for the best papers were announced. Honourable Mentions:
- An Evaluation of Audio Feature Extraction Toolboxes by David Moffat, David Ronan and Joshua D. Reiss
- Improving the robustness of the iterative solver in state-space modelling of guitar distortion circuitry by Ben Holmes and Maarten van Walstijn
- Digitizing the Ibanez Weeping Demon Wah Pedal by Chet Gnegy and Kurt Werner
- Two polarisation finite difference model of bowed strings with nonlinear contact and friction forces by Charlotte Desvages and Stefan Bilbao
- A Model for Adaptive Reduced-Dimensionality Equalisation by Spyridon Stasis, Ryan Stables and Jason Hockman
- Harmonic Mixing Based on Roughness and Pitch Commonality by Roman Gebhardt, Matthew Davies and Bernhard Seeber
As posted on the DAFx website – http://www.ntnu.edu/dafx15/
Day three of the Digital Audio Effects Conference (DAFx15) began with an excellent introduction and summary of Wave Digital filters and Digital Wave Guides by Kurt Werner and Julius O. Smith from CCRMA, in which the current state of the art in physical modelling no nonlinearities was presented and some potential avenues for future exploration was discussed. Following on from this work was discussed
- identification of metrical structure of music, by Elio from C4DM
- research on whether computer games noticeably prefer spacial audio, from York University
- Discussion and evaluation of feature extraction toolboxes, when to use different feature extraction tools, and how we can develop them in the future, by Dave from C4DM
- Work on vocal tract modelling from York, PPCU Budapest and KTH Sweden.